diverse work team reviewing results on a laptop, smiling

What is respectful workplace training and why is it needed?

Decades of organizational research consistently show that respectful workplace cultures are associated with lower litigation risk and stronger business outcomes, including improved engagement, retention, collaboration, safety, and ultimately productivity.

Respectful workplace training teaches employees and leaders the everyday behaviors that create a healthy, productive work environment. Organizations that invest in respectful workplace training establish shared expectations for how people communicate, collaborate, handle differences, address concerns, and maintain professional relationships so that everyone can do their best work.

It is about much more than just being kind and courteous. 

Respectful workplaces offer safe environments that strive to be free of such negative behaviors as harassment, bullying, bias, discrimination, incivility, and even violence. Core culture initiatives include:

  • Expressing regard for others – genuinely caring about their perspectives, strengths, and challenges, and treating everyone fairly and with dignity.
  • Eliminating bias and discrimination
  • Preventing harassment and bullying
  • Building inclusion
  • Emphasizing open and respectful communication
  • Committing to ethics and integrity
  • Providing physically and psychologically safe work environments
  • Developing positive, proactive leaders

Costs Associated with a Disrespectful Workplace

Employee disengagement results in reduced commitment, motivation, satisfaction, and effort and is estimated by Gallup to cost $10 trillion a year in lost productivity globally.
Voluntary turnover creates measurable costs through recruiting, onboarding, training, lost organizational knowledge, and slowed productivity, costing anywhere from 20% to 200% of an employee's base salary to replace them, depending on role and industry.
Harassment claims lead to costs that include the cost of investigating and substantiating claims internally, legal costs and settlements should the claim be litigated, and negative impact on brand.
Lost productivity. Incivility research has shown that 80% of those impacted lose work time worrying about negative interactions, 66% report reduced performance, and 48% intentionally reduce their work efforts.

How Respectful Workplace Training is Conducted

Many organizations mistakenly view respectful workplace training through a compliance-only lens, providing check-the-box type training that meets legal mandates but fails to connect with learners or lead to any meaningful change.

Cultivating and protecting a respectful work environment is not a one-time event or annual training mandate. Respectful work environments are an artifact of core organizational values practiced in daily interactions. Training is an important element of establishing respect as a core value.

Respectful workplace training is commonly delivered through a live in-person or virtual session, eLearning, instructor-led workshops, small-group discussions, or a blended approach.

Respectful workplaces offer safe environments that strive to be free of such negative behaviors as harassment, bullying, bias, discrimination, incivility, and even violence. Core culture initiatives include:

  • Expressing regard for others – genuinely caring about their perspectives, strengths, and challenges, and treating everyone fairly and with dignity.
  • Eliminating bias and discrimination
  • Preventing harassment and bullying
  • Building inclusion
  • Emphasizing open and respectful communication
  • Committing to ethics and integrity
  • Providing physically and psychologically safe work environments
  • Developing positive, proactive leaders

Costs Associated with a Disrespectful Workplace

Employee disengagement results in reduced commitment, motivation, satisfaction, and effort and is estimated by Gallup to cost $10 trillion a year in lost productivity globally.
Voluntary turnover creates measurable costs through recruiting, onboarding, training, lost organizational knowledge, and slowed productivity, costing anywhere from 20% to 200% of an employee's base salary to replace them, depending on role and industry.
Harassment claims lead to costs that include the cost of investigating and substantiating claims internally, legal costs and settlements should the claim be litigated, and negative impact on brand.
Lost productivity. Incivility research has shown that 80% of those impacted lose work time worrying about negative interactions, 66% report reduced performance, and 48% intentionally reduce their work efforts.

How Respectful Workplace Training is Conducted

Many organizations mistakenly view respectful workplace training through a compliance-only lens, providing check-the-box type training that meets legal mandates but fails to connect with learners or lead to any meaningful change.

Cultivating and protecting a respectful work environment is not a one-time event or annual training mandate. Respectful work environments are an artifact of core organizational values practiced in daily interactions. Training is an important element of establishing respect as a core value.

Respectful workplace training is commonly delivered through a live in-person or virtual session, eLearning, instructor-led workshops, small-group discussions, or a blended approach.

  • Each delivery method has advantages and disadvantages.

    Large live sessions can communicate unity and the importance of a message, but they are less interactive, which can make it difficult to transfer knowledge or practice skills.

    Synchronous learning efforts can be powerful for real-time discussions and practicing interpersonal skills. But people often find it harder to openly share concerns or opposing viewpoints in these settings. Facilitators can walk away feeling the training was a success, but if participants were only agreeing in the group setting, they are no more prepared to apply what they learned than before they started.

    eLearning has a reputation for being less personal. But high-quality, vignette-based eLearning can create prime opportunities for learning by building empathy through storytelling. eLearning is also far better at eliciting honest feedback and valid measurement as people feel safe to share their true opinions without fear of judgement.

5 Keys to Respectful Workplace Training Success

Respectful workplace training is successful when the initiative:

  • Creates shared expectations
  • Builds practical skills
  • Inspires buy-in and motivation
  • Transfers practical knowledge (for application, not just academic learning)
  • Measures employee readiness to apply training in their daily interactions

How Respectful Workplace Training Can Provide Strategic Insight

Unfortunately, due to the complications and costs traditionally associated with measuring respectful workplace training ROI, L&D teams are often only able to measure course completion and knowledge acquisition — whether people showed up and what they learned. These are important metrics, but they are far from the most important things organizations should measure if training is to have a real impact.

The good news is that L&D is uniquely positioned to go beyond these surface measurements to empower organizational change. Through training they have:

  • An attentive audience
  • Regular touchpoints
  • Visibility into multiple departments
  • Strategic alignment through training

Training is one of the few places where strategy, information, reflection, and behavior intersect.


From this vantage point, L&D can be the eyes and ears of the organization, identifying issues before they become crises. Training is one of the few places where strategy, information, reflection, and behavior intersect. That puts L&D at the heart of the organization’s culture and performance — if they can tap into it.

Measuring attendance and knowledge, simply won’t deliver on that vision. Instead, leaders should dig into what we know from decades of research on behavior change.

A behavior-based approach enhances respectful workplace training outcomes

When it comes to getting people to act differently, there is no one accepted behavior change model, but rather a few principles that should drive organizational efforts.

1. Use design thinking — start with the end in mind. Determine what people need to do differently for the organization to achieve its goals. This may seem obvious, but it is often missed. Many courses still focus primarily on knowledge, including legal definitions, concepts, and policy. A behavioral approach starts someplace entirely different. It starts with questions like:

  • How do people need to behave in order for us to reach our goals?
  • Which behaviors are most important to our outcomes?
  • What are the moments that matter?
  • What needs to be done in those moments?
  • What gets in the way of the behaviors we want to see?
  • What complexities make this behavior change hard?

Many courses still focus primarily on knowledge, including legal definitions, concepts, and policy. A behavioral approach starts someplace entirely different.


The course is then designed around the answers and what will make the desired change possible. Yes, there needs to be knowledge gained around definitions and laws, but the more important pieces of training will encourage learners to adopt behaviors that support learning application and the desired strategic outcomes.

2. Leverage key behavioral influencers. In the case of respectful workplace training, the best courses teach positive behaviors such as overcoming bias, speaking up against harassment, and showing appreciation. While it is easy to support these behaviors in theory, if the learner doesn’t see strong personal value in them, trying to use them can quickly become inconvenient or frustrating. Putting new behaviors into action depends on learners' attitudes, social support, and confidence in their ability to complete the given tasks.

  • Individual attitudes go beyond simply believing that the given behavior is a good idea. Most positive behaviors are perceived as good ideas. The question of change comes down to whether individuals feel motivated to adopt the desired behaviors. Do they fully believe that the behaviors will lead to good outcomes, and do they think the behavior(s) will be good for them personally?
  • Social support is also vital for behavior change. Humans are very good at adjusting their behavior to align with those around them. In one famous group study, participants were shown two lines and asked an obvious question about which line was longer. People clearly answered correctly, until a social component was introduced. When faced with a situation where everyone else in the room (actors) confidently gave the wrong answer, many participants conformed with the group, even when it was clear that the answer was wrong (Asch, 1950). This example and dozens of other experiments teach us that humans don’t make decisions in isolation. We weigh what others are doing. Even when something seems obvious, the group's behavior can change what we say and do. This makes social support an effective lever for organizations to consider when driving change. 
  • Employees must have the ability to act. Even if someone has positive attitudes toward a behavior, and believes the action would be supported, without the personal ability or resources to act, the behavior will not be adopted. So, when looking at desired workplace behaviors, the best training efforts take a systems thinking approach:
    • Will employees have the resources needed to adjust their behavior?
    • Do employees have the confidence needed to adopt this behavior?
    • Do employees see this request to adjust their current working practices or processes as a true organizational expectation, not just another "fad"?
    • Do employees feel like they have permission to do the new behavior?
    If the answer to any of these questions is no, the likelihood of seeing behavior change decreases dramatically.

Uncovering what's behind the "Knowing-Doing Gap"

Even when training succeeds in teaching new behaviors, it typically falls short at measuring whether those behaviors are actually applied — or at understanding what barriers stand in the way. L&D can be aware of a "knowing-doing gap" yet remain oblivious to what lives in that gap.

Research can reveal what's happening with learner attitudes & motivations, social support, and abilities, so why aren't those behavioral influencers measured? 

With new behavior-based training solutions like Atana's, they are.

Science-backed questions designed to elicit attitudes, beliefs, and perceptions — asked in the context of training — yield learner responses that become behavioral intelligence for the organization. Leaders get a more accurate and authentic read on how employees perceive the culture and the behaviors they’re being asked to adopt. Blind spots lurking inside the "knowing-doing gap" (often missed by traditional methods like engagement surveys), are uncovered.

Once organizations gain an understanding of where various teams sit in the areas of attitude, social support and ability, leaders can take quick, strategic action to address gaps. 

Connecting training insights to business performance and KPIs

Increasingly, L&D professionals are being pushed to connect training to KPIs. That can present a challenge because it often takes a long time to determine training's impact on things like engagement, retention, risk mitigation, and safety. Solutions that provide behavioral intelligence as an offshoot of training address this challenge head on. By measuring what is in the knowing-doing gap, they allow L&D professionals, team managers, and organizational leaders to act quickly, strategically, and with confidence to ensure that nothing stands in the way of the behavior change needed to positively impact critical KPIs. 


Atana: Training + Analytics = Desired Behaviors

Atana behavior-based training solutions are built precisely for the kind of successful result described above.  

Unlike compliance training that merely provides legal definitions or a checklist of dos and don’ts, our award-winning courses feature Hollywood-quality vignettes designed for learners to see themselves in the training. Courses depict real people, real situations, and real consequences. This is an important and often overlooked benefit, because the reality is ... most people see themselves as good, reasonable co-workers who would never do anything to disrespect another person. When they are invited to attend a respectful workplace training, they mistakenly believe that the training is for someone else — a clueless co-worker, a difficult employee, or a bullying boss. People need to see themselves in the scenarios so they can see how the learning applies to the way they act and the way they show up at work.

Through practical instruction, Atana teaches specific behaviors everyone can apply. In respectful workplace training, for example, these behaviors include speaking up when you see harassment or bullying, maintaining a psychologically safe environment, and expressing appreciation.  

Behavioral Assessments related to desired behaviors are seamlessly embedded in the courses. This adds important context to what's being asked and improves response validity while reducing the kind of survey fatigue that can occur in periodic engagement surveys. Following the training, leaders not only know completion rates and knowledge acquisition — the standard outcomes of training — they also know whether employees are prepared to apply the training. They can see teams that are excelling in respectful workplace attitudes and behaviors and teams that may need additional support. This added context bridges the gap between the training that happened and behavior change. Leaders are able to act precisely and with confidence, saving time and resources, while supporting initiative goals and organizational core values of respect.  


Success occurs when training changes what people are prepared to do in moments that matter. 


Whether or not respectful workplace training ultimately leads to organizational change is not driven by course completion, increased awareness or knowledge acquisition.

Success occurs when training has changed what people are prepared to do in moments that matter. Specifically, do employees recognize these moments when they arise, believe that applying training is worth it, feel supported by the people around them, and have the skills to act?

This is the science of behavior around which Atana was built.

Our combination of realistic scenarios, practical behavior-based instruction, and embedded assessments allows leaders to move beyond training as a moment and towards a sustainable, respectful workplace culture.  

Because the ultimate goal isn’t training. It is a workplace where respect is the norm in every interaction. 


About the Author

Amanda Hagman, Ph.D. | Chief Scientist: Behavioral Data Science
Dr. Hagman is an expert in behavior change and intervention science, adept at turning data into practical solutions that drive meaningful change in workplace behaviors. With a background in program evaluation and learning analytics, she uses predictive insights to foster positive behavioral outcomes on a large scale. As head of research at Atana, Dr. Hagman integrates behavioral change principles into training courses tackling common workplace issues. Her work targeting critical behavioral goals is designed to deliver concrete and lasting improvements for organizations.

  • Citations

    Gallup - 2026 State of the Global Workplace Report
    Boushey, H., & Glynn, S. J. (2012). There are significant business costs to replacing employees. Center for American Progress.  
    Cascio, W. F. (2000). Costing human resources: The financial impact of behavior in organizations (4th ed.). South-Western College Publishing.  
    Dube, Arindrajit & Freeman, Eric & Reich, Michael. (2010). Employee Replacement Costs. Institute of Industrial Relations, UC Berkeley, Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, Working Paper Series.  
    Han, S. H., Harold, C. M., & Cheong, M. (2022). A meta-analysis integrating 20 years of workplace incivility research: Antecedents, consequences, and boundary conditions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 43(3), 497–523.  
    Harter, J. K., Hayes, T. L., & Schmidt, F. L. (2002). Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: a meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology., 87(2), 268-280 
    Harter, J.K., Schmidt, F.L., Agrawal, S., Plowman, S.K., Blue, A. (2020). The Relationship Between Engagement at Work and Organizational Outcomes. 
    Porath, C., & Pearson, C. (2013). The price of incivility: Lack of respect hurts morale—and the bottom line. Harvard Business Review, 91(1–2), 114–121.  
    Schilpzand P., De Pater I. E. and Erez A. (2014), Workplace incivility: A review of the literature and agenda for future research, J. Organiz. Behav., 37: S57–S88. doi: 10.1002/job.1976  
    Yang L, Caughlin DE, Gazica MW, Truxillo DM, Spector PE. Workplace mistreatment climate and potential employee and organizational outcomes: A meta-analytic review from the target’s perspective. J Occup Health Psychol. 2014;19(3):315-335. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036905